Saturday, October 12, 2013

The Eugenics Movement







In further researching, I have come to realize that it would not be wise to limit my study of the Eugenics Movement to a single figure such as Charles Davenport. Instead, I will analyze the key proponents of the movement as a whole and pull evidence from specific events and historical figures. David Starr Jordan and Francis Galton, along with Davenport, made extremely bold claims that formed the basis of the Eugenics movement. Historians have made connections to these scientific theories and hypothesis all across the world. Places such as Nazi, Germany or the US and Mexican Border have used claims coming from the Eugenics Movement as base for their racist and oppressive acts towards minorities. Hitler deemed people of Jewish decent not human and simply different, an idea that is said to have been originated from the "American Eugenics Movement campaign for ethnic cleansing" (Black 1). Science is used as justification for pure racism; scientific racism. David Starr Jordan developed the idea of race and blood with the Eugenics Movement, an idea that would used to forbid Mexicans or people of Latin descent to migrate to America as it was forged that they possessed diseases. Eugenics is "the science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics. Developed largely by Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race"(Google definition). Ironically enough, the scientific study developed to 'improve' the human race took a slight turn for the worst. This forces me to wonder more about the fact this movement is largely left out of many history lessons. I've have began to understand the complexity to eugenics and the scientific aspect of it, but its history and storyline needs to be told. My perception of how to approach the topic has changed now that I understand the Eugenics movement, developed by Galton, was intended to help the human race. Why did it become something else, much larger and more powerful than intended? Were the researches and scientist of this movement racist? The more I research, the more intrigued I am about the topic. I feel that something isn't completely there and there are missing pieces to the story. But that is the beauty in hidden history. 

1 comment:

  1. I think that this is a very interesting idea to write a paper on because I've heard the word before but could never remember what it was about. After further investigation, it does appear as though Eugenics gets a bad wrap. This negative portrayal is mostly due to an idea of "white supremacy" and the actual eradication all non-white peoples, but I do think that there were good intentions to start. What did your research illuminate on the subject? I'm very curious to find out about its origins and current status in science.

    ReplyDelete